EMF Exposure Guidelines and Standards

Understanding Misleading EMF Exposure Limits and Health Risks

The ICNIRP exposure standards, which most countries have adopted throughout the world, are extremely inadequate and are based on research from over 20 years ago which relies on thermal effects of RF radiation, and are not designed to protect against long-term and non-thermal biological effects. There are thousands of scientific studies since, throughout the world, by accredited scientists showing biological damage when people have been exposed to acceptable EMF levels according to ICNIRP standards. The studies that show no effects usually have a conflict of interest. The worlds governments are not relaying crucial information to the populations, who remain uneducated on this worldwide future catastrophe.

Radio Frequency     (all values are in uW/m2  Micro watts per square meter)

A comparison chart showing radio frequency and electric/magnetic field exposure limits for different standards, including New Zealand Standard, Independent Group of Scientists IGNIR, Building Biology SBM-2015, and BioInitiative Report. Frequencies listed are 1800MHz 4G, >2000MHz (3G, 4G LTE, 5G), 50Hz electric, and magnetic field exposure, with various maximum and anomaly levels noted.
Dachshund holding and reading a newspaper titled 'Daily Dog'
Comparison of radiofrequency research results from non-industry and industry studies. Non-industry studies show 70% harmful effect and 30% no effect, based on 96 and 41 cases respectively. Industry studies show 32% harmful effect and 68% no effect, based on 27 and 57 cases respectively. Data compiled by Dr. Henry Lai, University of Washington.